The process to receive justice involves a lot of time, energy and bureaucracy, but it might be worth it for anyone who has posed for artsy photos – whether professionally or with an ex. It is possible to copyright your entire nude body in the US – the upside being that you can sue for a significant amount of money if your nudes are stolen and shared. She spent weeks trying desperately to get the images taken down, to no avail. He interviewed a woman who had sold foot pics to a random man, only to find them being resold on Patreon. The practice of distributing photos without the consent of the people depicted is not unique to Wikifeet – it’s not even the only site that is foot-centric to do so.įoot fetish sites are replete with images of everyday people – sourced from Instagram and other social media – as well as stolen from porn and other modeling.Īfter photos of his feet were uploaded to a foot fetish website against his will, writer Hussein Kesvani looked into having his tootsies copywritten. When journalist Laura Basset reached out to the fan who was posting pics of her feet to the site, he even admitted creating IMDB profiles for women whose photos he wanted to upload. But IMDB is simply an indicator that a person has been involved in the production of a movie, TV show or even its soundtrack. What counts as a celeb is decidedly arbitrary – the person depicted must have an IMDB page – a result of the original founder not being aware of any other metric when he started the site in 2008. Kailee Donovan? Yanina Latorre? I have no doubt they are influential in their respective circles, but it seems a generous assertion that all the feet depicted are of people too famous to be reached for approval. They are also overwhelmingly thin and light skinned, with a heavy representation of Europeans, despite the fact Wikifeet is blocked in the European Union due to an EU Copyright Directive.Īnother thing I noticed is that I had never heard of many of these so-called celebs. There’s no rule listed that all the models must be female, but in all my searching, they were exclusively feminine presenting. Underage subjects must be completely cropped out.” Specifically, photos must have “everyone reasonably covered when pictures were taken. According to the site’s own rules, the photos uploaded must be of celebs over 18 and can’t depict nudity. Or perhaps more accurately: it looks like the kind of low-rent porn site that one reaches by accidentally hitting a pop-up ad.Īnyway, to your query about consent. For a site that boasts over 3 million visitors per month (in 2017, when the stat was last reported), and is inarguably the largest online celeb foot forum, it looks a lot like Craigslist…. What I did not know – and was wildly unprepared for – was how janky and 2007-era internet its design would be. What I knew already was that it featured an absurdly large collection of foot images and that, outside of its community of foot fetishists, that it’s largely considered a joke on the internet. I have to admit that while I was conceptually familiar with Wikifeet, the self-dubbed “collaborative celebrity feet site,” that I had not extensively perused it myself before receiving this question. Am I the only one that thinks sites like Wikifeet should shut down their “celebrity” part of the website and should cater more to people who consent to having their photos online for the particular fetish? I’ve seen countless YouTubers do their best to hide their bare feet because they don’t want to be on Wikifeet, but sometimes, slip-ups happen and they wind up on the website. It then dawned on me: one of Wikifeet’s notable (and I use that term loosely) features is celebrity feet, and it got me wondering how many of these public figures actually consented to their feet being on a foot fetish website? Q: A couple weeks back, some friends and myself were joking about the website Wikifeet and how easy it is for those with foot fetishes to access these photos.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |